The Framework › Academic
Learning Resources & Materials
Distribution of responses
How institutions vary
Middle 80% of the 20 institutions with enough responses. Academic domain mean: 7.9.
Institution is a major factor here: weaker and stronger institutions are 5.1 points apart on this topic. Where a student studies shapes their experience more than the topic itself does.
What we ask
“Overall, the materials and resources work well for me.”
What students say, and why
Poorly made slides, hard-to-access materials, worn-out equipment.
"The slides aren’t made very well or very informatively."
"Easier access to learning materials would help me prepare."
"The blades are worn and the saw guides so frayed you can’t use them."
A full set of aids available when needed, plus info sessions and materials.
"All the aids are available, not because I need them all, but they’re there."
"The various info sessions and the material we received."
Representative, de-identified comments from the lowest- and highest-scoring responses, translated where needed.
Related insights
No deep-dive published for this topic yet. Browse all insights or the methodology.
How we measure it
This is the topic-level average across its subtopics, on a 0-10 scale (higher is better), so an individual subtopic can score higher or lower than the topic shown here. Figures are scored responses from the last 12 months, mapped to the 2026 framework via the canonical question mapping; the cross-2020 figure on the Index uses the full response base. Movement compares the most recent six months with the prior six. Distribution bands: 0-4, >4-<8, 8-10. Cross-institution aggregate; no single institution identified; minimum group size applied.
Read the State of the Student Experience 2026
Our annual report: what three million student datapoints reveal about wellbeing, teaching and belonging, and what actually moves recommendation and retention. Free, for a work email.