The Framework › Academic
Course Content & Relevance
Distribution of responses
How institutions vary
Middle 80% of the 19 institutions with enough responses. Academic domain mean: 7.9.
Institution is a major factor here: weaker and stronger institutions are 5.0 points apart on this topic. Where a student studies shapes their experience more than the topic itself does.
What we ask
“The course content feels relevant to me.”
What students say, and why
Theory that feels disconnected from practice and from the trade.
"Very hard theory, and too little to read up on if you wanted to."
"Most of the teaching doesn’t feel relevant to the trade; it should be more targeted."
The “red thread”: content that visibly connects to the placement and the exam.
"When exams cover what we’ve spent four months learning, the red thread is perfect."
"Things from class made sense in the placement, like technical language and science."
"I get good learning in the subjects, and I can see I’ll use it in practice."
Representative, de-identified comments from the lowest- and highest-scoring responses, translated where needed.
Related insights
How we measure it
This is the topic-level average across its subtopics, on a 0-10 scale (higher is better), so an individual subtopic can score higher or lower than the topic shown here. Figures are scored responses from the last 12 months, mapped to the 2026 framework via the canonical question mapping; the cross-2020 figure on the Index uses the full response base. Movement compares the most recent six months with the prior six. Distribution bands: 0-4, >4-<8, 8-10. Cross-institution aggregate; no single institution identified; minimum group size applied.
Read the State of the Student Experience 2026
Our annual report: what three million student datapoints reveal about wellbeing, teaching and belonging, and what actually moves recommendation and retention. Free, for a work email.