The Framework › Academic
Assessment & Grading
Distribution of responses
How institutions vary
Middle 80% of the 14 institutions with enough responses. Academic domain mean: 7.9.
Institution is a major factor here: weaker and stronger institutions are 2.4 points apart on this topic. Where a student studies shapes their experience more than the topic itself does.
What we ask
“I understand how my work is graded.”
What students say, and why
Unclear expectations and exam format: students can’t tell what to study.
"Too many topics and slides that aren’t structured; it’s unclear what the exam will look like."
"Too much content, unclear what to study, and no preparation material."
"Too many tests, too much theory, too many papers."
Clarity about the exam: when students know the format, nerves drop.
"Knowing what the tests are about makes me less nervous, because I know what to do."
"The teachers explained the exam well."
"I have a sense of what we need to do, and where to find answers about the exam."
Representative, de-identified comments from the lowest- and highest-scoring responses, translated where needed.
Related insights
How we measure it
This is the topic-level average across its subtopics, on a 0-10 scale (higher is better), so an individual subtopic can score higher or lower than the topic shown here. Figures are scored responses from the last 12 months, mapped to the 2026 framework via the canonical question mapping; the cross-2020 figure on the Index uses the full response base. Movement compares the most recent six months with the prior six. Distribution bands: 0-4, >4-<8, 8-10. Cross-institution aggregate; no single institution identified; minimum group size applied.
Read the State of the Student Experience 2026
Our annual report: what three million student datapoints reveal about wellbeing, teaching and belonging, and what actually moves recommendation and retention. Free, for a work email.